Tag Archives: Credit Crisis

Weekend Update 1/21/12

A rainy Saturday in Los Angeles seems like a good time to put down some random thoughts.

The SOPA Battle

So SOPA is dead, and as I said earlier in the week, it was a fatally flawed piece of legislation. But before the Free Culture crowd gets too self-righteous, please consider your new hero and spokesperson, Kim Dotcom.

Kim’s a fun loving guy with 30,000 square foot mansions in three countries, a fleet of Ferraris all made possible by selling stolen content from artists around the world. A bunch of the musicians I worked with in the 1960′s and 1970′s, who made wonderful records that are still on everyone’s I Pod, have seen their royalties cut by 80%. Not enough for a retired 70 year old to live on. American’s are truly stupid when it comes to discussing this issue. The one thing we make that everyone else in the world wants to get a hold of–our music, our movies, our video games—the knuckleheads on the copyleft want to fight a death match to make sure they are free to the whole world. Of course these same people don’t mind paying an arm and a leg for their German car or their Japanese TV. Continue reading

Financial Musings

Apple Store-Shanghai

I have been known to make occasional predictions about our economy, and this quiet time between Christmas and New Years leads me to venture once again into these waters.

In general I feel that the incessant Chicken Little “sky is falling” rhetoric coming out of the media is creating opportunities in the American stock market. When Apple is selling at a P/E of 14 and I can buy Chevron at a P/E of 8 with a 3% yield, good quality companies are selling cheaper than I can remember. Europe may have a financial crisis, but remember after 2008 the ECB did relatively little to shore up their banks. The stress tests were pathetic compared to the ones forced on the U.S. banks. Germany and France are rich enough to fix this problem and since they have both benefited from the Euro, I doubt they will let it crash. The temporary problems of European banks does however provide an opportunity for U.S. Multinationals to raise their game. Procter and Gamble competes with Unilever all over the world to sell shampoo and detergent. Unilever depends on European banks for lines of credit and my guess is that P & G’s cost of capital is cheap compared to Unilever.

Speaking of cost of capital. Despite the hand wringing from Republicans, the U.S. Treasury’s cost of capital is at an all time low. What does that tell you? That the rest of the world sees the U.S. as the best bet for the future. Part of this Republican meme about the “decline of America” is based on 19th Century notions of measuring trade. In David Ricardo’s time, the fact that England was a manufacturing powerhouse that exported to high value goods to Portugal and Portugal was a rural country that exported wine to England gave them each a comparative advantage in their sector. But when Apple assembles an I Pad in China and imports it into the United States it adds $500 to our trade deficit. But where is the great value captured in the product? By Apple shareholders, because the Chinese labor component is a tiny fraction of the selling cost? So traditional economics is totally distorting our real strength in the world economy.

This is not to say that there isn’t a job crisis in America as our less educated workers are caught in a global labor price arbitrage with Korean and Chinese workers. But this too will sort itself out in the next ten years as huge numbers of Baby Boomers retire. Even now, many companies are trying to hold on to Boomers with hard to replace skills past their retirement age. I’m well aware that there are a few Thirty-somethings who troll this blog that are totally frightened that they will never live as well as their parents. It is kind of pathetic because rather than adopting the obvious solutions to shore up their retirement prospects like removing the cap on Medicare and Social Security payroll deductions on high earners and drastically cutting back the defense budget, they are trying to start a generational war by scapegoating my generation and stealing their pensions.

I try to teach my students that one of America’s great understandings is the link between art and science. Hold up your I Phone and you intuitively get that. I’m pretty confident we can continue to excel as long as we somehow get our politics straightened out. That of course will be the task in front of us for 2012.

Interregnum Revisited

Ken Ballweg was kind enough to point me back to a post I wrote for Talking Points Memo two years ago on my continuing obsession: The Interregnum. It is one of those periods that come along perhaps once a century, where “the old is dying and the new cannot be born”.And then Alex Bowles sent me a wonderful essay by Marc Chandler called Crisis and Instability–Searching for Terra Firma which makes much of the same argument.

 This is similar to where we are now, in-between. What is at stake is not the capitalist system as such, but how it is organized; not just economics, but political economy. How will productivity gains be distributed? What is the relation between employee and employer? What is their relation to the state? What is the relation between industrial and finance capital?

And then I woke yesterday to this stunning analysis of the global political unrest that has shaken India, Israel, Great Britain, Egypt, Syria, Greece, Spain and now the U.S. Continue reading

Life After Empire

In 1922, the British Empire held sway over a population of about 458 million people, one-quarter of the world’s population,and covered more than 13,000,000 square miles: approximately a quarter of the Earth’s total land area. By 1956, after the disastrous attempt to hold on to the Suez Canal, the British finally abandoned the last of their imperial pretensions and settled into rebuilding their own country, culture and spirit. By 1964 the world was sharing in the joy of life after empire.

To read the analysis of David Sanger in the New York Times this morning, life in America for our children will be a pinched, pale shadow of itself.

For Mr. Obama and his successors, the effect of those projections is clear: Unless miraculous growth, or miraculous political compromises, creates some unforeseen change over the next decade, there is virtually no room for new domestic initiatives for Mr. Obama or his successors. Beyond that lies the possibility that the United States could begin to suffer the same disease that has afflicted Japan over the past decade. As debt grew more rapidly than income, that country’s influence around the world eroded. Continue reading

Faith and The Future

Earlier this year Paul Krugman noted that the U.S, economy is suffering from “a crisis of faith”, implying that we had lost trust in the institutions of capitalism. The word “credit” comes from the Latin root–Credo–”I believe.” When we don’t believe our President or Hank Paulson or the CEO of Citibank, the whole edifice of contemporary American economics begins to crumple.

Much of this edifice has been built on the theories of Milton Friedman and the Chicago School which believes that we humans are essentially mechanical welfare maximizing tools. Contemporary economists don’t like words like “faith”, because they are not mathematical constructs that can plugged into a formula. But the economists, so sure in their formulas, believed that human welfare was measured by possessions–”when you die, the one with the most toys wins”.

But what if we could build a new economics based around the notion of ethics, community and stewardship of both our planet and our culture? Part of the Rebuilding America, I have been talking about is the realization that our obsessive consumerism was really only a way to anesthesize ourselves against the dread of a culture full of stress and empty of meaning. Part of the reorientation might require us to rethink “the Growth Imperative”–the idea that human welfare can only be increased if the economy grows at the maximum rate without excess inflation. The conservative economist Huber takes this notion to its logical conclusion (without a touch of irony).

Cut down the last redwood for chopsticks, harpoon the last blue whale for sushi, and the additional mouths fed will nourish additional human brains, which will soon invent ways to replace blubber with Olestra and pine with plastic. Humanity can survive just fine in a planet- covering crypt of concrete and computers.

I don’t want to live in Peter Huber’s world and so I have faith that we as a country can create a new social compact that will not be based on mathematics and notions of self interest, but rather on caring, trust and reciprocity. Of course America’s reinvention will require political will, but it will also need a spiritual and cultural transformation that will be just as wrenching.

Credit Logjam

As I said on Oct. 13,the massive injections of liquidity by governments around the world are beginning to calm the markets. The credit markets, which is all I’ve been paying attention to, are beginning to ease, with three month LIBOR falling to around 4%. This is the first real sign that interbank lending is beginning to take place.

No one should mistake this for a sign that the real economy is out of the woods, but it does mean that the stock market can go back to functioning on real valuations of earnings, not panic and fear. Part of the reason there was such a consistent downdraft in the market for the last two weeks is that tomorrow is the settlement day for the billions of Lehman Bros. Credit Default Swaps. Many hedge funds that wrote swaps on Lehman debt had to raise cash in order to pay up to the mortgage bond holders. With that out of the way, maybe things will settle down for a while. However the task ahead of us is great. Vince Farrell notes the following.

In 1980, total household debt was equal to 50% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Today, household debt is about 100% of GDP. Looked at from a different angle, since 1983 debt has grown at a rate of 8.9% a year and GDP at 5.9% (from Jim Grant in the Wall Street Journal). From 1983, debt has grown a total of $55 trillion, while GDP grew by about $11 trillion.

Back in July, I wrote that we would inevitably have to “return to the mean”. To go back to the 1980 level of household debt will be incredibly painful for an economy that is 70% based on consumer spending.

 

America 3.0;Rebooting After The Crash

I gave a talk today at the Annenberg Research Park Colloquium about the roll of the technology and communication communities in rebuilding America. The video and Slideware are available here.

Bear Flag Republic

This is a very good sign for the New Federalism.

California officials said that in the first day of a highly-anticipated bond offering today they have already sold $1.465 billion, or 37% of the state’s $4 billion in revenue anticipation notes being put up for sale this week.

Bottoming Out?

As I said on Friday, it feels like some sort of bottoming process is in place. Far be it from me to pick the bottom, but as my college friend Vince Farrell wrote me this morning, the fall of the S & P 500 is near historical bottoms.

Jeremy Grantham, one of the most skilled investors for generations, is quoted in this weeks Barrons as saying fair value for the S&P is 1025. The index closed Friday at 899. He readily acknowledges that an overshoot of 20% is not just likely, but probable. 20% off 1025 brings you to the low 800′s and that is where we got intraday last Friday.

Also, there is a triple bottom between 775 and 800 going back to 9/11/01 and into 2002. Maybe 800 is the technical bottom of the market. 800 would also be a decline of 49% from last Octobers high of 1576.

If we have reached a floor for the market, the last week was brutal for some supposedly smart people.

On Friday, Aubrey K. McClendon, the chief executive of Chesapeake Energy, issued a statement saying he had been forced to sell all of his 33.5 million shares in Chesapeake because of a margin call.

Sumner M. Redstone, the chairman of Viacom and CBS, disclosed that he would sell $400 million in shares in those companies to pay down a loan. For shareholders, margin calls can be painful, forcing them to liquidate portfolios at exactly the worst moment, as stocks are near panic lows.

That Sumner Redstone would own his controlling stakes in Viacom and CBS on margin is pretty appalling. The old guy’s lifestyle with his young wife might be getting the better of him.

Just because the panic selling may have slowed, does not mean anything about the real economy. Sales of High Definition TV’s are down 40% YOY, and all three American Auto companies are in deep trouble. The next sign of trouble I would watch for is credit card defaults. They are soaring.

What is Chris Cox Trying to Hide?

Senator Charles Grassley asked the SEC Inspector General Kotz to give him a report on the collapse of Bear Stearns.

Before it was released to the public on Sept. 26, Kotz deleted 136 references, many detailing SEC memos, meetings or comments, at the request of the agency’s Division of Trading and Markets that oversees investment banks.

“People can judge for themselves, but it sure looks like the SEC didn’t want the public to know about the red flags it apparently ignored in allowing Bear Stearns and other investment banks to engage in excessively risky behavior,” Grassley said in an e-mailed statement.

Since the beginning of this most recent episode of the credit collapse I have written that the roots of the crisis lay in the SEC’s June 2004 decision to let the investment banks set their own capital ratios, a radical move away from the traditional leverage regulations. But Bloomberg’s reporting of the unredacted report shows that the SEC was clearly aware that Bear Stearns was in uncharted territory in terms of its debt to equity ratios.

Trading and Markets (SEC Division) had oversight of holding companies for the five biggest U.S. investment banks via the Consolidated Supervised Entity Program. The division failed to follow up on “red flags” raised by New York-based Bear Stearns’s increasingly “significant concentration of market risk” from mortgage securities, according to the full document.

All the other attempts to find a scapegoat, by Republicans (Barnie Frank pushing Fannie to finance poor people’s homes) and Democrats (Phil Gramm pushing through the termination of Glass-Steagel) alike, pale in comparison to the asleep at the switch role of the SEC. Never in the history of “Regulatory Capture” has an agency gone so in the bag for the business it was supposed to be regulating. There is no way the Republicans can escape responsibility for this one.