<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Jackson Overload</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jontaplin.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-overload/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jontaplin.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-overload/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:53:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-40449</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jontaplin.com/?p=4561#comment-40449</guid>
		<description>Yes, I know, I know.  And you&#039;re right: you&#039;re just the messenger.

Were I to have the privilege of a chat with Q, I doubt that MJ would be high on my list of talking points.

(Same goes for you, btw.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I know, I know.  And you&#8217;re right: you&#8217;re just the messenger.</p>
<p>Were I to have the privilege of a chat with Q, I doubt that MJ would be high on my list of talking points.</p>
<p>(Same goes for you, btw.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Turner</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-40448</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jontaplin.com/?p=4561#comment-40448</guid>
		<description>Hugo, maybe you should tell that to Quincy Jones.  I&#039;m just the messenger here, not the author of the message.

But facial reconstruction?  Nosectomies galore?  Cleft chin modification?  Skin peels and bleaching?  I think Q knows more than we do...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugo, maybe you should tell that to Quincy Jones.  I&#8217;m just the messenger here, not the author of the message.</p>
<p>But facial reconstruction?  Nosectomies galore?  Cleft chin modification?  Skin peels and bleaching?  I think Q knows more than we do&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-40447</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jontaplin.com/?p=4561#comment-40447</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I meant &quot;who&quot;, not &quot;whe&quot;.  I&#039;m not even sure that &quot;whe&quot; is a word, apart from, perhaps, skydiviers as the jump from aircraft...&quot;wheee!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I meant &#8220;who&#8221;, not &#8220;whe&#8221;.  I&#8217;m not even sure that &#8220;whe&#8221; is a word, apart from, perhaps, skydiviers as the jump from aircraft&#8230;&#8221;wheee!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-40446</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jontaplin.com/?p=4561#comment-40446</guid>
		<description>Oh Jeepers, Rick, that&#039;s just not fair.  So what, that the man sought surcease from his dangerous Vitiligo; doesn&#039;t mean that he wished not &quot;to be black&quot;.  (By the way, what sense does that make in the context of a pysche whe spent his life as a James Brown wannabe?)

Ease up, bro.  Let him be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Jeepers, Rick, that&#8217;s just not fair.  So what, that the man sought surcease from his dangerous Vitiligo; doesn&#8217;t mean that he wished not &#8220;to be black&#8221;.  (By the way, what sense does that make in the context of a pysche whe spent his life as a James Brown wannabe?)</p>
<p>Ease up, bro.  Let him be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Turner</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-40445</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jontaplin.com/?p=4561#comment-40445</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s some of the most sensible talk from someone who actually knew MJ:

http://men.style.com/details/features/full?id=content_9937&amp;pageNum=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s some of the most sensible talk from someone who actually knew MJ:</p>
<p><a href="http://men.style.com/details/features/full?id=content_9937&amp;pageNum=1" rel="nofollow">http://men.style.com/details/features/full?id=content_9937&amp;pageNum=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-40444</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jontaplin.com/?p=4561#comment-40444</guid>
		<description>Too bad, Bernie, that you hadn&#039;t written earlier to advise us of our proper national agenda in lieu of mourning one of our more absurd celebrities.  If only your advice had come sooner, lest we--how shall we put it?--distract ourselves with expressions of the loss of a mere entertainer.

You&#039;re quite right to remind us that during WWII there was no time for levity.  Fully from December 8, 1941 until</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad, Bernie, that you hadn&#8217;t written earlier to advise us of our proper national agenda in lieu of mourning one of our more absurd celebrities.  If only your advice had come sooner, lest we&#8211;how shall we put it?&#8211;distract ourselves with expressions of the loss of a mere entertainer.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re quite right to remind us that during WWII there was no time for levity.  Fully from December 8, 1941 until</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marylandonmymind</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-40443</link>
		<dc:creator>marylandonmymind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jontaplin.com/?p=4561#comment-40443</guid>
		<description>Yep, America is on the cusp of historic CHANGE:

1) Universal health care
2) Economic upheaval and downward adjustment of the American lifestyle
3) Cap and Trade -- getting a handle on global warming
4) Reform of the financial industry.
5) Death of the big-city newspaper industry. Possible death of network and local TV news.

Personally, I haven&#039;t written a single word about the King of Pop on my blog, and I don&#039;t plan to.  -- Bernie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, America is on the cusp of historic CHANGE:</p>
<p>1) Universal health care<br />
2) Economic upheaval and downward adjustment of the American lifestyle<br />
3) Cap and Trade &#8212; getting a handle on global warming<br />
4) Reform of the financial industry.<br />
5) Death of the big-city newspaper industry. Possible death of network and local TV news.</p>
<p>Personally, I haven&#8217;t written a single word about the King of Pop on my blog, and I don&#8217;t plan to.  &#8212; Bernie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-40442</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jontaplin.com/?p=4561#comment-40442</guid>
		<description>I guess I see these MJ strings as studies in judgmentalism, including my own judgmentalism.  Without reference to MJ&#039;s personal life, his music is, here, justly up for grabs.  Jon and others imply that he was touted beyond his talent.  That&#039;s certainly so.  Who among us would admit that, say, Elli Wiesel likewise was overblown?  My point is that it happens all the time, but at the center is still a person who has either something to say or else a fresh way to say the same old shit, or perhaps, if we&#039;re lucky, something fresh to say in a new way.

To me, if an artist is an artist, I&#039;m for her.  I don&#039;t quibble with the art; I want more artists and I want them to thrive.  So you&#039;re either an artist or you&#039;re not.  Michael Jackson was born infused with artistic talent.  Sure, I wish he&#039;d used his obvious gifts more originally, but at least he used them, to the delight of countless people throughout the globe (--er, glove).

Goodie for us that we know the difference between a true musician and an entertainer.  But there&#039;s much to be said for entertainers, and Jehovah knows MJ was one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I see these MJ strings as studies in judgmentalism, including my own judgmentalism.  Without reference to MJ&#8217;s personal life, his music is, here, justly up for grabs.  Jon and others imply that he was touted beyond his talent.  That&#8217;s certainly so.  Who among us would admit that, say, Elli Wiesel likewise was overblown?  My point is that it happens all the time, but at the center is still a person who has either something to say or else a fresh way to say the same old shit, or perhaps, if we&#8217;re lucky, something fresh to say in a new way.</p>
<p>To me, if an artist is an artist, I&#8217;m for her.  I don&#8217;t quibble with the art; I want more artists and I want them to thrive.  So you&#8217;re either an artist or you&#8217;re not.  Michael Jackson was born infused with artistic talent.  Sure, I wish he&#8217;d used his obvious gifts more originally, but at least he used them, to the delight of countless people throughout the globe (&#8211;er, glove).</p>
<p>Goodie for us that we know the difference between a true musician and an entertainer.  But there&#8217;s much to be said for entertainers, and Jehovah knows MJ was one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roman</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-40441</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jontaplin.com/?p=4561#comment-40441</guid>
		<description>Jon,

&quot;If all news and all culture has to be sensational, then we’re fucked.&quot;

Yes we are, on so many levels.

Do you discuss &quot;perception management&quot; in any of your courses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon,</p>
<p>&#8220;If all news and all culture has to be sensational, then we’re fucked.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes we are, on so many levels.</p>
<p>Do you discuss &#8220;perception management&#8221; in any of your courses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Bowles</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-40440</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Bowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jontaplin.com/?p=4561#comment-40440</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt;practical men with impractical goals.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I like that. Also, it explains a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite=""><p>practical men with impractical goals.</p></blockquote>
<p>I like that. Also, it explains a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
