Comments on: Contrarian Notions http://jontaplin.com/2008/12/19/contrarian-notions/ Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:51:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Rick Turner http://jontaplin.com/2008/12/19/contrarian-notions/comment-page-2/#comment-25918 Rick Turner Sun, 21 Dec 2008 07:22:55 +0000 http://jontaplin.com/?p=3147#comment-25918 Ahh, the Department of Redundancy Department, eh? Ahh, the Department of Redundancy Department, eh?

]]> By: Rick Turner http://jontaplin.com/2008/12/19/contrarian-notions/comment-page-2/#comment-25919 Rick Turner Sun, 21 Dec 2008 07:22:55 +0000 http://jontaplin.com/?p=3147#comment-25919 Ahh, the Department of Redundancy Department, eh? Ahh, the Department of Redundancy Department, eh?

]]> By: Rick Turner http://jontaplin.com/2008/12/19/contrarian-notions/comment-page-2/#comment-25920 Rick Turner Sun, 21 Dec 2008 07:22:55 +0000 http://jontaplin.com/?p=3147#comment-25920 Ahh, the Department of Redundancy Department, eh? Ahh, the Department of Redundancy Department, eh?

]]> By: Rick Turner http://jontaplin.com/2008/12/19/contrarian-notions/comment-page-2/#comment-25932 Rick Turner Sun, 21 Dec 2008 07:22:55 +0000 http://jontaplin.com/?p=3147#comment-25932 Ahh, the Department of Redundancy Department, eh? Ahh, the Department of Redundancy Department, eh?

]]> By: Akira Bergman http://jontaplin.com/2008/12/19/contrarian-notions/comment-page-2/#comment-25913 Akira Bergman Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:28:59 +0000 http://jontaplin.com/?p=3147#comment-25913 Rick, I use that word to be concise and technical. I mean no offence. I don't think we are too many for the earth, but maybe for our economic model. They are also called the "unemployed" but this word has become too loaded. The official figures do not reflect the reality. Another example of the distortion of language by the cynical elite. The earth can support much more, given the right system of government. But maybe it is better to vacate some of the natural resources we have plundered and give them back to mother earth and her free and innocent children. Rick,

I use that word to be concise and technical. I mean no offence.

I don’t think we are too many for the earth, but maybe for our economic model. They are also called the “unemployed” but this word has become too loaded. The official figures do not reflect the reality. Another example of the distortion of language by the cynical elite.

The earth can support much more, given the right system of government. But maybe it is better to vacate some of the natural resources we have plundered and give them back to mother earth and her free and innocent children.

]]> By: Akira Bergman http://jontaplin.com/2008/12/19/contrarian-notions/comment-page-2/#comment-25915 Akira Bergman Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:28:59 +0000 http://jontaplin.com/?p=3147#comment-25915 Rick, I use that word to be concise and technical. I mean no offence. I don't think we are too many for the earth, but maybe for our economic model. They are also called the "unemployed" but this word has become too loaded. The official figures do not reflect the reality. Another example of the distortion of language by the cynical elite. The earth can support much more, given the right system of government. But maybe it is better to vacate some of the natural resources we have plundered and give them back to mother earth and her free and innocent children. Rick,

I use that word to be concise and technical. I mean no offence.

I don’t think we are too many for the earth, but maybe for our economic model. They are also called the “unemployed” but this word has become too loaded. The official figures do not reflect the reality. Another example of the distortion of language by the cynical elite.

The earth can support much more, given the right system of government. But maybe it is better to vacate some of the natural resources we have plundered and give them back to mother earth and her free and innocent children.

]]> By: Akira Bergman http://jontaplin.com/2008/12/19/contrarian-notions/comment-page-2/#comment-25931 Akira Bergman Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:28:59 +0000 http://jontaplin.com/?p=3147#comment-25931 Rick, I use that word to be concise and technical. I mean no offence. I don't think we are too many for the earth, but maybe for our economic model. They are also called the "unemployed" but this word has become too loaded. The official figures do not reflect the reality. Another example of the distortion of language by the cynical elite. The earth can support much more, given the right system of government. But maybe it is better to vacate some of the natural resources we have plundered and give them back to mother earth and her free and innocent children. Rick,

I use that word to be concise and technical. I mean no offence.

I don’t think we are too many for the earth, but maybe for our economic model. They are also called the “unemployed” but this word has become too loaded. The official figures do not reflect the reality. Another example of the distortion of language by the cynical elite.

The earth can support much more, given the right system of government. But maybe it is better to vacate some of the natural resources we have plundered and give them back to mother earth and her free and innocent children.

]]> By: Rick Turner http://jontaplin.com/2008/12/19/contrarian-notions/comment-page-2/#comment-25911 Rick Turner Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:09:17 +0000 http://jontaplin.com/?p=3147#comment-25911 Akira, I guess the redundancies might be considered human beings...human beings considered as cannon fodder... As long as there are more of us than the planet can comfortably support, we have plenty of redundant human capital... I realize that's getting Malthusian, but put too many rats in a cage and don't give them enough to eat, and they start eating one another. Add in a good dose of greed and/or religious fundamental fervor, and there you have it. Or here we have it... Akira, I guess the redundancies might be considered human beings…human beings considered as cannon fodder… As long as there are more of us than the planet can comfortably support, we have plenty of redundant human capital… I realize that’s getting Malthusian, but put too many rats in a cage and don’t give them enough to eat, and they start eating one another. Add in a good dose of greed and/or religious fundamental fervor, and there you have it. Or here we have it…

]]> By: Rick Turner http://jontaplin.com/2008/12/19/contrarian-notions/comment-page-2/#comment-25912 Rick Turner Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:09:17 +0000 http://jontaplin.com/?p=3147#comment-25912 Akira, I guess the redundancies might be considered human beings...human beings considered as cannon fodder... As long as there are more of us than the planet can comfortably support, we have plenty of redundant human capital... I realize that's getting Malthusian, but put too many rats in a cage and don't give them enough to eat, and they start eating one another. Add in a good dose of greed and/or religious fundamental fervor, and there you have it. Or here we have it... Akira, I guess the redundancies might be considered human beings…human beings considered as cannon fodder… As long as there are more of us than the planet can comfortably support, we have plenty of redundant human capital… I realize that’s getting Malthusian, but put too many rats in a cage and don’t give them enough to eat, and they start eating one another. Add in a good dose of greed and/or religious fundamental fervor, and there you have it. Or here we have it…

]]> By: Rick Turner http://jontaplin.com/2008/12/19/contrarian-notions/comment-page-2/#comment-25930 Rick Turner Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:09:17 +0000 http://jontaplin.com/?p=3147#comment-25930 Akira, I guess the redundancies might be considered human beings...human beings considered as cannon fodder... As long as there are more of us than the planet can comfortably support, we have plenty of redundant human capital... I realize that's getting Malthusian, but put too many rats in a cage and don't give them enough to eat, and they start eating one another. Add in a good dose of greed and/or religious fundamental fervor, and there you have it. Or here we have it... Akira, I guess the redundancies might be considered human beings…human beings considered as cannon fodder… As long as there are more of us than the planet can comfortably support, we have plenty of redundant human capital… I realize that’s getting Malthusian, but put too many rats in a cage and don’t give them enough to eat, and they start eating one another. Add in a good dose of greed and/or religious fundamental fervor, and there you have it. Or here we have it…

]]>