Jon, thanks for the heads up. Good thing, this Internet
and iTunes. North Dakota would be totally unbearable
without it.
On the issue of funding for public broadcasting, I couldn’t
agree more. In fact, just the evening before I was thinking
and writing the same sentiments. The PB relationship with
corporate America (pharmaceuticals, oil companies) and even
some departments within the federal government (DHS – ugh!)
needs to be dissolved completely and all funding for
CPB/PBS/NPR must come from tax funds allocated by Congress
in sufficient amounts to allow for the kind of in-depth
ingestigative reporting that is so lacking in the 24/7 cable
and major network news outlets. In other words, what is
required is a complete reversal of the successful efforts
made by the Right that defunded PB, drove out the likes of
Bill Moyers, left it groveling for funding through pledge
drives, and effectively gutted the system to the extent
that it hasn’t the capacity to do the kind of in-depth,
timely, and uninfluenced investigative reporting required
to keep government on the straight and narrow. It’s clear
that the compromised MSM won’t do and given that NPR is
now talking about cutbacks, it’s clear that the already
strapped supporters of PB are unable to cough up more to
make up the government funding shortfall. In short, the
federal tax monies we’ve paid into the system are already
there, but need to be effectively reallocated (much like
the money to buy computers for children in India needs to
be used to buy computers for the kids in South Central
L.A.). The need is pressing as the effectiveness of an
unbiased press to inform us is crucial to the survival
of the democracy at this juncture. Like the intersection
of medicine and profit motive, where the health care
system compromised by the cancerous effects of the
insurance industry is at the point of being on death’s
doorstep, the commercial press’s self-serving interests
are now preventing the patient’s access to information
needed for recovery and long term health. Likewise, I
can’t buy PB’s claim that private industry funding of
PB has no influence on the decisions made to pursue
certain stories, or the levels to which investigations
are conducted, especially when newsworthy stories involve
those industries.
With all of the other catastrophes on Obama’s plate,
I doubt public broadcasting will be high on his list
for significantly increased funding. As I believe that there’s
still a great hunger for a viable alternative to sound-byte,
ratings-driven broadcast news, I hope I’m wrong about the
attention that the new Administration will give public broadcasting.
Jon Taplin is a Professor at the USC Annenberg School for Communication. He has produced film, music and television with Martin Scorsese, George Harrison, Bob Dylan and The Band among others.
I saw y0u on “The Drug Years” on Sundance an hour ago, you young-looking bastard.
Dan
December 14, 2008 at 9:25 am
Talking about Broadband but still thinking that folks have to be in LA to listen huh?
http://www.kpfk.org/listen-live.html
rhumbamusicandpost
December 14, 2008 at 11:18 am
Jon, thanks for the heads up. Good thing, this Internet
and iTunes. North Dakota would be totally unbearable
without it.
On the issue of funding for public broadcasting, I couldn’t
agree more. In fact, just the evening before I was thinking
and writing the same sentiments. The PB relationship with
corporate America (pharmaceuticals, oil companies) and even
some departments within the federal government (DHS – ugh!)
needs to be dissolved completely and all funding for
CPB/PBS/NPR must come from tax funds allocated by Congress
in sufficient amounts to allow for the kind of in-depth
ingestigative reporting that is so lacking in the 24/7 cable
and major network news outlets. In other words, what is
required is a complete reversal of the successful efforts
made by the Right that defunded PB, drove out the likes of
Bill Moyers, left it groveling for funding through pledge
drives, and effectively gutted the system to the extent
that it hasn’t the capacity to do the kind of in-depth,
timely, and uninfluenced investigative reporting required
to keep government on the straight and narrow. It’s clear
that the compromised MSM won’t do and given that NPR is
now talking about cutbacks, it’s clear that the already
strapped supporters of PB are unable to cough up more to
make up the government funding shortfall. In short, the
federal tax monies we’ve paid into the system are already
there, but need to be effectively reallocated (much like
the money to buy computers for children in India needs to
be used to buy computers for the kids in South Central
L.A.). The need is pressing as the effectiveness of an
unbiased press to inform us is crucial to the survival
of the democracy at this juncture. Like the intersection
of medicine and profit motive, where the health care
system compromised by the cancerous effects of the
insurance industry is at the point of being on death’s
doorstep, the commercial press’s self-serving interests
are now preventing the patient’s access to information
needed for recovery and long term health. Likewise, I
can’t buy PB’s claim that private industry funding of
PB has no influence on the decisions made to pursue
certain stories, or the levels to which investigations
are conducted, especially when newsworthy stories involve
those industries.
With all of the other catastrophes on Obama’s plate,
I doubt public broadcasting will be high on his list
for significantly increased funding. As I believe that there’s
still a great hunger for a viable alternative to sound-byte,
ratings-driven broadcast news, I hope I’m wrong about the
attention that the new Administration will give public broadcasting.
Jeffwi
December 14, 2008 at 7:49 pm
Speaking of Bill Moyers, did you see this Friday night- Glenn Greenwald and Emma Coleman Jordan on Bill Moyers Journal?
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/index-flash.html
T Bone Burnett
December 15, 2008 at 12:27 am