<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Savage Capitalism&#039;s Failure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jontaplin.com/2008/10/10/savage-capitalisms-failure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jontaplin.com/2008/10/10/savage-capitalisms-failure/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:00:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick Turner</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2008/10/10/savage-capitalisms-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-18648</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 06:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtaplin.wordpress.com/?p=2334#comment-18648</guid>
		<description>There is the Gaia theory...that Mother Earth will protect herself from disastrous decline.   That kind of predicts a sort of population control that is drastic and inevitable if we don&#039;t head it off ourselves.   Populations can only grow to a certain point and be healthy before Malthusian issues arise, before high density provides perfect conditions for plagues, and before the rats just go crazy...we being the rats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is the Gaia theory&#8230;that Mother Earth will protect herself from disastrous decline.   That kind of predicts a sort of population control that is drastic and inevitable if we don&#8217;t head it off ourselves.   Populations can only grow to a certain point and be healthy before Malthusian issues arise, before high density provides perfect conditions for plagues, and before the rats just go crazy&#8230;we being the rats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Turner</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2008/10/10/savage-capitalisms-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-18650</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 06:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtaplin.wordpress.com/?p=2334#comment-18650</guid>
		<description>There is the Gaia theory...that Mother Earth will protect herself from disastrous decline.   That kind of predicts a sort of population control that is drastic and inevitable if we don&#039;t head it off ourselves.   Populations can only grow to a certain point and be healthy before Malthusian issues arise, before high density provides perfect conditions for plagues, and before the rats just go crazy...we being the rats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is the Gaia theory&#8230;that Mother Earth will protect herself from disastrous decline.   That kind of predicts a sort of population control that is drastic and inevitable if we don&#8217;t head it off ourselves.   Populations can only grow to a certain point and be healthy before Malthusian issues arise, before high density provides perfect conditions for plagues, and before the rats just go crazy&#8230;we being the rats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Turner</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2008/10/10/savage-capitalisms-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-18652</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 06:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtaplin.wordpress.com/?p=2334#comment-18652</guid>
		<description>There is the Gaia theory...that Mother Earth will protect herself from disastrous decline.   That kind of predicts a sort of population control that is drastic and inevitable if we don&#039;t head it off ourselves.   Populations can only grow to a certain point and be healthy before Malthusian issues arise, before high density provides perfect conditions for plagues, and before the rats just go crazy...we being the rats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is the Gaia theory&#8230;that Mother Earth will protect herself from disastrous decline.   That kind of predicts a sort of population control that is drastic and inevitable if we don&#8217;t head it off ourselves.   Populations can only grow to a certain point and be healthy before Malthusian issues arise, before high density provides perfect conditions for plagues, and before the rats just go crazy&#8230;we being the rats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2008/10/10/savage-capitalisms-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-18643</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtaplin.wordpress.com/?p=2334#comment-18643</guid>
		<description>Things like the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, rising sea levels, more severe weather, our growing mounds of nuclear waste, and now our renewed push to expand the number of nuclear plants around the world, and therefore the increased chance of more Chernobyls (or worse), along with probably several other nasty surprises we haven&#039;t heard about yet, will, I&#039;m pretty sure, do a pretty good job of taking care of the population problem over the coming decades.  Even if we don&#039;t see any horrendous global wars.

The population of exclusive offshore money havens will continue to swell, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things like the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, rising sea levels, more severe weather, our growing mounds of nuclear waste, and now our renewed push to expand the number of nuclear plants around the world, and therefore the increased chance of more Chernobyls (or worse), along with probably several other nasty surprises we haven&#8217;t heard about yet, will, I&#8217;m pretty sure, do a pretty good job of taking care of the population problem over the coming decades.  Even if we don&#8217;t see any horrendous global wars.</p>
<p>The population of exclusive offshore money havens will continue to swell, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2008/10/10/savage-capitalisms-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-18645</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtaplin.wordpress.com/?p=2334#comment-18645</guid>
		<description>Things like the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, rising sea levels, more severe weather, our growing mounds of nuclear waste, and now our renewed push to expand the number of nuclear plants around the world, and therefore the increased chance of more Chernobyls (or worse), along with probably several other nasty surprises we haven&#039;t heard about yet, will, I&#039;m pretty sure, do a pretty good job of taking care of the population problem over the coming decades.  Even if we don&#039;t see any horrendous global wars.

The population of exclusive offshore money havens will continue to swell, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things like the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, rising sea levels, more severe weather, our growing mounds of nuclear waste, and now our renewed push to expand the number of nuclear plants around the world, and therefore the increased chance of more Chernobyls (or worse), along with probably several other nasty surprises we haven&#8217;t heard about yet, will, I&#8217;m pretty sure, do a pretty good job of taking care of the population problem over the coming decades.  Even if we don&#8217;t see any horrendous global wars.</p>
<p>The population of exclusive offshore money havens will continue to swell, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2008/10/10/savage-capitalisms-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-18651</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtaplin.wordpress.com/?p=2334#comment-18651</guid>
		<description>Things like the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, rising sea levels, more severe weather, our growing mounds of nuclear waste, and now our renewed push to expand the number of nuclear plants around the world, and therefore the increased chance of more Chernobyls (or worse), along with probably several other nasty surprises we haven&#039;t heard about yet, will, I&#039;m pretty sure, do a pretty good job of taking care of the population problem over the coming decades.  Even if we don&#039;t see any horrendous global wars.

The population of exclusive offshore money havens will continue to swell, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things like the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, rising sea levels, more severe weather, our growing mounds of nuclear waste, and now our renewed push to expand the number of nuclear plants around the world, and therefore the increased chance of more Chernobyls (or worse), along with probably several other nasty surprises we haven&#8217;t heard about yet, will, I&#8217;m pretty sure, do a pretty good job of taking care of the population problem over the coming decades.  Even if we don&#8217;t see any horrendous global wars.</p>
<p>The population of exclusive offshore money havens will continue to swell, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kelly</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2008/10/10/savage-capitalisms-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-18639</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtaplin.wordpress.com/?p=2334#comment-18639</guid>
		<description>pond - I&#039;m looking for growth in different areas than we have in the past. Even different conceptually - like quality of life versus quantity of money. But I don&#039;t really see how to reduce our draw on the Earths resources without serious population decline. And somehow I can&#039;t even see an old mean cynic like me suggesting how to start on that one. I think we&#039;ll just have to reduce and conserve and push forward in new research and eventually get back to my early 60&#039;s dreams of working to move beyond Earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pond &#8211; I&#8217;m looking for growth in different areas than we have in the past. Even different conceptually &#8211; like quality of life versus quantity of money. But I don&#8217;t really see how to reduce our draw on the Earths resources without serious population decline. And somehow I can&#8217;t even see an old mean cynic like me suggesting how to start on that one. I think we&#8217;ll just have to reduce and conserve and push forward in new research and eventually get back to my early 60&#8217;s dreams of working to move beyond Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kelly</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2008/10/10/savage-capitalisms-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-18649</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtaplin.wordpress.com/?p=2334#comment-18649</guid>
		<description>pond - I&#039;m looking for growth in different areas than we have in the past. Even different conceptually - like quality of life versus quantity of money. But I don&#039;t really see how to reduce our draw on the Earths resources without serious population decline. And somehow I can&#039;t even see an old mean cynic like me suggesting how to start on that one. I think we&#039;ll just have to reduce and conserve and push forward in new research and eventually get back to my early 60&#039;s dreams of working to move beyond Earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pond &#8211; I&#8217;m looking for growth in different areas than we have in the past. Even different conceptually &#8211; like quality of life versus quantity of money. But I don&#8217;t really see how to reduce our draw on the Earths resources without serious population decline. And somehow I can&#8217;t even see an old mean cynic like me suggesting how to start on that one. I think we&#8217;ll just have to reduce and conserve and push forward in new research and eventually get back to my early 60&#8217;s dreams of working to move beyond Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Taplin</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2008/10/10/savage-capitalisms-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-18636</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Taplin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtaplin.wordpress.com/?p=2334#comment-18636</guid>
		<description>Pond- I agree that our fixation with growing GDP annually is self-defeating. However, some sectors (GreenTech, digital commerce and distribution) will continue to grow and become more efficient, so that general standards of living could be maintained at lower rates of GDP growth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pond- I agree that our fixation with growing GDP annually is self-defeating. However, some sectors (GreenTech, digital commerce and distribution) will continue to grow and become more efficient, so that general standards of living could be maintained at lower rates of GDP growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Taplin</title>
		<link>http://jontaplin.com/2008/10/10/savage-capitalisms-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-18637</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Taplin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jtaplin.wordpress.com/?p=2334#comment-18637</guid>
		<description>Pond- I agree that our fixation with growing GDP annually is self-defeating. However, some sectors (GreenTech, digital commerce and distribution) will continue to grow and become more efficient, so that general standards of living could be maintained at lower rates of GDP growth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pond- I agree that our fixation with growing GDP annually is self-defeating. However, some sectors (GreenTech, digital commerce and distribution) will continue to grow and become more efficient, so that general standards of living could be maintained at lower rates of GDP growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
